Investigate Development Case: Theory Of Mind/Autism

Investigate Development Case: Theory of Mind/Autism.

 

MAKE A DECISION: Do you think Harrison has Autism Spectrum Disorder?

Yes
No
Why? Give reasons for why you chose the way you did. Consider the following factors in your reasons:

Theory of Mind
Harrison’s play behavior
His parent’s separation
Please see attachment for instructions

Rubric
PSY 1821 Case Development Rubric 2.1PSY 1821 Case Development Rubric 2.1CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 to >15.0 ptsAdvancedAll key components of the Case Development questions are addressed. Proper terminology to describe concepts in the vignette are used (3 or more terms).15.0 to >10.0 ptsProficientMost key components of the Case Development questions are addressed. Proper terminology to describe concepts in the vignette are used (2 terms).10.0 to >5.0 ptsDevelopingSome key components of the Case Development questions are addressed. Proper terminology to describe concepts in the vignette are used (1 term).5.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorFew or no key components of the Case Development questions are addressed. Proper terminology to describe concepts in the vignette are not used.0.0 ptsNot Present20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus10.0 to >9.0 ptsAdvancedWriting remains focused on the topic assigned throughout, bringing each paragraph back to the thesis and making connections to sources. Paper also meets all length requirements (250 words or more).9.0 to >8.0 ptsProficientWriting mostly focuses on the topic assigned but misses some connections between sources and thesis. Paper meets at least 80 percent of the length requirement.8.0 to >7.0 ptsDevelopingWriting focuses on topic throughout but loses focus or digresses in individual paragraphs. Paper meets at least 70 percent of the length requirement.7.0 to >1.0 ptsPoorWriting struggles to focus on the topic in individual paragraphs and in the paper as a whole. Paper meets at least 65 percent of the length requirement.1.0 to >0 ptsNot PresentWriting was not submitted, is about a topic other than the one assigned, or meets less than 65 percent of the length requirement.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style10.0 to >9.0 ptsAdvancedAssignment correctly follows APA formatting, including a title page, abstract, header, page numbers, and reference page. Sources are cited correctly in the document.9.0 to >8.0 ptsProficientAssignment is mostly correctly formatted and/or sources are cited, but there are a few errors in the format.8.0 to >7.0 ptsDevelopingAssignment exhibits many errors in APA formatting and/or sources are cited, but there are several errors in the format.7.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorAPA formatting is attempted, but several elements are missing or incorrect, an/or some of the sources are not cited and/or the format is incorrect.0.0 ptsNot PresentSources are not cited at all/format is not correct and/or APA is not attempted.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar10.0 to >5.0 ptsAdvancedSpelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.5.0 to >3.0 ptsProficientThere are some spelling and grammar errors. Some sentence level errors are present as well. Paragraphs contain some varied sentence structures.3.0 to >2.0 ptsDevelopingSpelling and grammar errors distract from meaning. Paragraphs are poorly formed.2.0 to >0.0 ptsPoorMultiple spelling and grammar errors. Sentences are incomplete or unclear.0.0 ptsNot Present10.0 pts

CASE INFORMATION:

You have been asked by ABC Co to investigate possible fraud. The company has provided you with 3 Excel files (customer list, unpaid invoices, and shipping list) to anlayze in IDEA.

ABC Customer List 2018.xlsx

 

ABC Inc Unpaid Invoices 2018.xls

 

ABC Shipping File 2018.xls

 

The first analysis you want to do in IDEA is to join the customer and unpaid invoice file to see if there were any transactions between the 2 files that do not have matching customer numbers (Result #1). The 2nd analysis to do in IDEA is to join the unpaid invoice file and the shipping file to see if there were any transactions between the 2 files that did not have matching invoice numbers (Result #2)

ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS:

Based on your readings, current literature, and the Fraud Examiners Manual analyze the results from your analysis, include the following in your discussion using the template provided Week 6 Case Template.docx

:

· Identify what your data analysis indicates as far as the possibility of fraud at this company and what indication led you to the conclusion that fraud may or may not have been committed in this case. Be sure to provide copies of your IDEA reports including the history files.

· What would you do next in your investigation based on your preliminary results in this investigation?

· How would you prevent any unusual transactions you found from happening in the future?

· Using the Fraud Examiner’s Manual Appendix C:Sample Forms locate the Fraud Incident Report Log. You will be creating a similar form and filling out this form specifically for this case. If you would like, you can run other commands using IDEA on this data to generate additional reports to support your conclusions.

WRITING REQUIREMENTS:

· 3 pages including the Fraud Incident Report (not including title , abstract or reference page)

· Proper APA format and any special format required in this case.

· Minimum of 3 scholarly sources not including the textbook

Case Study On Biomedical Ethics In The Christian Narrative